In "Equal Access
to Training for Black and Minority Ethnic Nurses" Ken Grainger asserts
that although black and minority ethnic young people are increasingly attracted
to nursing, statistics show that black and ethnic minorities have less than
half the chance of getting into a nursing school than white applicants do. Grainger
supports his claim by suggesting that the nursing remains a working class
occupation that requires multiple skills including the less pleasant aspects of
the human condition. The writer soon suggests that social factors such as
class, school, background ,location, gender, and ethnicity may have the biggest
impact on the acceptance rate of individuals in nursing schools. Ken Grainger
seems to have a firm tone against the discrimination of black and minority
ethnic groups in the acceptance of nursing schools. He seems to educate his
audience by providing statistics that support the claim of discrimination of minorities
in the field of nursing.
Ashley Romero English 102
Monday, April 8, 2013
Rhetorical Precis of" When the World Is White"
In "When the World Is White" Mary L. Wilsby asserts that there are racial disparities in the nursing profession and nursing education. Wilsby supports her claim with the following statement American nursing has been and continues to be a predominantly white, female profession and that does not reflect the diversity of the population. The writer soon suggests that the United States nursing education system has been viewed by some as a culture that reflects white, middle-class values which has created barriers for minority students. Mary Wilsby seems to have a strong-minded view on the prominent figure in the professional nursing. She seems to keep her audience in mind by supporting her claims with statistics as well as offering a solution to the racial disparities in the nursing profession and nursing education.
Tuesday, March 12, 2013
Rhetorical Precis "Turning Base Hits into Earned Runs"
In "Turning Base Hits into Earned Runs: Improving the Effectiveness of Forensic DNA Data Bank Programs" Frederick R. Bieber asserts that a benefit of DNA databse hits is an increase in potential suspects. However, the failure of law enforcement to follow up on DNA matches. Bieber believes that since law enforcement failures to follow up on these leads, individuals become less confident in the judicial system. Bieber keeps his affirmitive tone throughout his article by suggesting multiple times that DNA collection and databanks are efficent, however, it is up to law enforcement and the system to follow up on these leads.
Bieber, Frederick R. "Turning Base Hits Into Earned Runs: Improving The Effectiveness Of Forensic DNA Data Bank Programs." Journal Of Law, Medicine & Ethics 34.2 (2006): 222-233. OmniFile Full Text Select (H.W. Wilson). Web. 12 Mar. 2013.
Rhetorical Precis of "Twenty Years of DNA Databanks in the U.S. "
In "Twenty Years of DNA Databanks in
the U.S." Sheldon Krimsky emphasizes that there has been an expansion of
the categories of individuals whose forensic DNA samples are deposited into
CODIS. This varies from convicted felons to sex offenders to undocumented immigrants
and misdemeanants who have neither been charged nor convicted of a crime. Krimsky
supports his claim by stating that 11 states have passed laws allowing police
to obtain DNA forensic profiles of arrestees who have not been charged or
convicted of a crime. Proposition 16 in California helps enforce the point the
writer is giving to the reader which is that DNA is influential to the
convictions of criminals and of solving cold cases.
Krimsky, Sheldon. "Twenty Years Of
DNA Databanks In The U.S." Genewatch 24.5 (2011): 9-11. Academic
Search Premier. Web. 12 Mar. 2013.
Rhetorical Precis "Revise Policies Mandating Offender DNA Collection"
In "Revise Policies
Mandating Offender DNA Collection" Ralph Taylor et. al state that all
states in the United States require some categories of convicted offenders to
submit physical samples for later DNA analysis. Taylor et. al support their
claim by stating that the use of DNA collection is to keep offenders from
reoffending. The writers soon suggest that investigators use these DNA profiles
from offenders and from CODIS to DNA evidence from past and current crimes.
Taylor et. al warn their readers that the back log for the CODIS system is so
large that the lag time for the submission of DNA into it is a serious flaw. However,
they feel that the use of CODIS to solve cold cases is a plus to the lag time.
Brian R. Wyant, et al.
"Revise Policies Mandating Offender Dna Collection." Criminology
& Public Policy 6.4 (2007): 851-861. Academic Search Premier.
Web. 12 Mar. 2013.
Rhetorical Precis of "Beyond the Cold Hit: Measuring the Impact of the National DNA Data Bank"
In "Beyond the
Cold Hit: Measuring the Impact of the National DNA Data Bank on Public Safety
at the City and County Level" Matthew Gabriel et. al assert that by utilizing
the Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) many "cold hits" are provided
by comparing DNA profiles from crime scenes to offenders residing in CODIS.
Gabriel et. al support their claim by showing that the DNA testing in property
crimes, “best evidence” items left at residential and commercial burglaries in
San Francisco are subjected to streamlined DNA testing. To date, nearly 75
cases have been analyzed, resulting in 58 CODIS eligible DNA profiles and 42 cold
hits (a 72% hit rate). The writers soon suggest the effectiveness of CODIS,
citing the overburdened police investigators and understaffed DNA laboratories,
are unable to address the increased caseloads. Gabriel et. al seem to have a
supportive tone towards using CODIS by providing the success rate of all DNA
matches in a wide variety of crimes. They seem to keep their audience in mind
by showing the success of using CODIS however, they point out how the backlog for
CODIS is substantially long resulting in hardened criminals walking the
streets.
Gabriel, Matthew, Cherisse
Boland, and Cydne Holt. "Beyond The Cold Hit: Measuring The Impact Of The
National DNA Data Bank On Public Safety At The City And County Level." Journal
Of Law, Medicine & Ethics 38.2 (2010): 396-411. Academic Search
Premier. Web. 12 Mar. 2013.
Tuesday, March 5, 2013
Chapter 13 Rhetorical Precis
In Chapter 13 of "Good Reasons Researching and Writing
Effective Arguments" Lester Faigley and Jack Selzer assert
that there are four major components to a proposal argument. Faigley and Selzer
support their claim by going in to detail of each of these components: identifying
and defining the problem, stating a proposed solution, convincing readers that
the proposed solution is fair and will work and demonstrating that the solution
is feasible. The writers soon suggest that by setting out your solution first
and the clear goals of your solution, if the readers agree they will soon want
to take action. Faigley and Selzer seem
to have a supportive tone towards providing students with steps to writing a proposal
argument. They seem to keep their audience in mind by outlining each step and
giving key details about each step that can help a writer become successful
when writing a proposal argument.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)